Updated on by
A New Study Analyzes Who Will Be Scammed
Sensitive people more vulnerable to online dating scams
The Study Was Conducted by the BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY
Per their results, sensitive and less emotionally intelligent people are more likely to be vulnerable to online dating scams.
That is the finding of a study by Dr Martin Graff of the University of South Wales presented on Tuesday 26 April 2016, at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference in Nottingham, England.
Dr Graff said: “Perpetrators of dating scams simply set up false profiles on dating websites with the sole purpose of extracting money from their victims. The scammer first grooms a victim by expressing love for them before outlining their desperate circumstances. They then attempt to request money from the victim. Our study focused on why some individuals are more likely to become the victims of these scams than others.”
In the study, over 90 victims of dating scams took part in questionnaires relating to their personality, how they relate to other people, self-esteem and emotional intelligence; as well as their age and gender.
After the results were analyzed, they revealed that victims had used dating sites for less than four weeks and had parted with amounts ranging from £50 (US$73) to £63,000 (US$92,000). Victims had a tendency to be efficient, organized and disciplined. However, they also were more likely to express emotion and display a preoccupied attachment style. This means they could be overly dependent on and seeking approval from the person to whom they are attached (which in this case was the scammer).
Martin said: “With the rise in the number of people using online dating, more and more people are likely to fall victim. Scammers use sophisticated techniques and eventually may begin to know exactly the sort of people to target and how to manipulate them.”
“These findings will be beneficial to dating sites and law enforcement agencies in attempting to protect the vulnerable from being scammed. Further research should include interviews with a larger sample of people who have been the dating scam victims.”
The analysis also revealed that the people who were most likely to be victims of online dating scams tended to be efficient, organized, and disciplined, but they were also much more likely to be sensitive, express emotions, and display a preoccupied attachment style. As the researchers explain, this means that they could be overly dependent on others and seeking approval from the person they’re attached to.
In our increasingly digitized world, there’s a rise in the number of people who are using online dating, which means more and more people are likely to become victims of dating scams. Martin says that online scammers used sophisticated techniques and “eventually may begin to know exactly the sort of people to target and how to manipulate them.”
On a more positive note, a recent study found that psychopaths have a particularly hard time manipulating others online. While their charming facades are harder to see through in person, the research revealed that their ability to manipulate others is much less effective without a visual medium.
To view the press release click here »
What SCARS|RSN Visitors Were Looking For
SCARS™ Editorial Team
Latest posts by SCARS™ Editorial Team (see all)
- SCARS™ Scam Basics: Cyberstalking - May 19, 2020
- General Paul Nakasone – Do You Know Him? Another Stolen Face / Stolen Identity - May 18, 2020
- SCARS™ Breaking News: Nigeria Begins Repaying Victims Of Nigerian-Based Cybercrime [UPDATED] - May 18, 2020
- SCARS™ Guide: How To Spot Fake U.S. Passports [UPDATED] - May 14, 2020
- SCARS™ Special Report: U.S. FBI Reported Cybercrimes Passes 5 Million - May 12, 2020
![SCARS™ Guide: How To Spot Fake U.S. Passports [UPDATED]](https://romancescamsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/How-To-Recognize-Fake-US-Passports-500x383.png)
so if the scammers are using the sophisticated methodes to groom them victims, so what kind of sort the personality would be qualificated toi the criminal psychology??
Don’t understand your question.