Second-Party Fraud - Financial Fraud - Facilitated By Money Mules - What It Is - How It Works - 2026Legal Disclaimer:
The content provided on this platform regarding psychological topics is intended solely for educational and entertainment purposes. The publisher makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information presented. The content is designed to raise awareness about various psychological subjects, and readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and verify information independently.
The information presented does not constitute professional advice, diagnosis, or treatment of any psychological disorder or disease. It is not a substitute for professional medical or mental health advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Readers are advised to seek the guidance of a licensed medical professional for any questions or concerns related to their mental health.
The publisher disclaims any responsibility for actions taken or not taken based on the content provided. The treatment of psychological issues is a serious matter, and readers should consult with qualified professionals to address their specific circumstances. The content on this platform is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a therapist-client relationship.
For the purposes of this Disclaimer:
The information contained on this website is for general information purposes only.
The Company assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents of the Service.
In no event shall the Company be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tort, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Service or the contents of the Service. The Company reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents on the Service at any time without prior notice.
The Company does not warrant this website in any way.
This website may contain links to external websites that are not provided or maintained by or in any way affiliated with the Company.
Please note that the Company does not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites.
The information given by SCARS is for general guidance on matters of interest only. Even if the Company takes every precaution to ensure that the content of this website is both current and accurate, errors can occur. Plus, given the changing nature of laws, rules, and regulations, there may be delays, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information contained on this website.
SCARS is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information.
SCARS may use copyrighted material that has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The Company is making such material available for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.
The Company believes this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the United States Copyright law.
If You wish to use copyrighted material from this website for your own purposes that go beyond fair use, You must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
The Service may contain views and opinions which are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other author, agency, organization, employer, or company, including SCARS.
Comments published by users are their sole responsibility and the users will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The Company is not liable for any comment published by users and reserves the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever.
The information on the Service is provided with the understanding that the Company is not herein engaged in rendering legal, accounting, tax, medical or mental health, or other professional advice and services. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting, tax, legal, medical or mental health, or other competent advisers.
In no event shall the Company, its team, board of directors, volunteers, or its suppliers be liable for any special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with your access or use or inability to access or use the Service.
All information on this website is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose.
SCARS will not be liable to You or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information given by the Service or for any consequential, special, or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
If you have any questions about this Disclaimer, You can contact Us:
The following specific modalities within the practice of psychology are restricted to psychologists appropriately trained in the use of such modalities:
SCARS and the members of the SCARS Team do not engage in any of the above modalities in relationship to scam victims. SCARS is not a mental healthcare provider and recognizes the importance of professionalism and separation between its work and that of the licensed practice of psychology.
SCARS is an educational provider of generalized self-help information that individuals can use for their own benefit to achieve their own goals related to emotional trauma. SCARS recommends that all scam victims see professional counselors or therapists to help them determine the suitability of any specific information or practices that may help them.
SCARS cannot diagnose or treat any individuals, nor can it state the effectiveness of any educational information that it may provide, regardless of its experience in interacting with traumatized scam victims over time. All information that SCARS provides is purely for general educational purposes to help scam victims become aware of and better understand the topics and to be able to dialog with their counselors or therapists.
It is important that all readers understand these distinctions and that they apply the information that SCARS may publish at their own risk, and should do so only after consulting a licensed psychologist or mental healthcare provider.
SCARS IS A DIGITAL PUBLISHER AND DOES NOT OFFER HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE, LEGAL ADVICE, FINANCIAL ADVICE, OR SERVICES THAT SCARS IS NOT LICENSED OR REGISTERED TO PERFORM.
IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE FOLLOWING ANY MEDICALLY RELATED INFORMATION PRESENTED ON OUR PAGES.
ALWAYS CONSULT A LICENSED ATTORNEY FOR ANY ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL MATTERS.
A LICENSED FINANCIAL OR TAX PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE ACTING ON ANY INFORMATION RELATING TO YOUR PERSONAL FINANCES OR TAX RELATED ISSUES AND INFORMATION.
SCARS IS NOT A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR – WE DO NOT PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. ANY INVESTIGATIONS THAT SCARS MAY PERFORM IS NOT A SERVICE PROVIDED TO THIRD-PARTIES. INFORMATION REPORTED TO SCARS MAY BE FORWARDED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AS SCARS SEE FIT AND APPROPRIATE.
This content and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for licensed or regulated professional advice. Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider, lawyer, financial, or tax professional with any questions you may have regarding the educational information contained herein. SCARS makes no guarantees about the efficacy of information described on or in SCARS’ Content. The information contained is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible situations or effects. SCARS does not recommend or endorse any specific professional or care provider, product, service, or other information that may be mentioned in SCARS’ websites, apps, and Content unless explicitly identified as such.
The disclaimers herein are provided on this page for ease of reference. These disclaimers supplement and are a part of SCARS’ website’s Terms of Use.
All original content is Copyright © 1991 – 2023 Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. (Registered D.B.A SCARS) All Rights Reserved Worldwide & Webwide. Third-party copyrights acknowledge.
U.S. State of Florida Registration Nonprofit (Not for Profit) #N20000011978 [SCARS DBA Registered #G20000137918] – Learn more at www.AgainstScams.org
Contact the law firm for the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated by email at legal@AgainstScams.org
The SCARS Institute writers use artificial intelligence as one of several tools in the preparation, research, review, and production of educational material. AI does not replace our writers, editors, subject matter experts, researchers, or human judgment. People write, review, revise, approve, and publish our work.
Because of the way we write, some AI writing detectors can produce false positives and label human-written or heavily human-edited material as AI-generated. Those results should be treated with caution.
One reason is our writing style.
SCARS Institute material is written for people who have experienced trauma, fraud, betrayal, grief, shame, confusion, and other forms of emotional distress. That changes how we structure information. We use clear lead-ins, repeated concepts, section breaks, restatement of difficult ideas, and deliberate reinforcement of major points. We do this because a traumatized reader can struggle with concentration, working memory, attention, information retention, and cognitive overload. A sentence that seems repetitive to a casual reader can help someone under stress understand and remember the point being made.
Our writing is also highly structured. We have people on our team who were trained in older newspaper writing, technical writing, educational writing, and writing designed for high comprehension. We use established editorial practices drawn from sources such as The Chicago Manual of Style and The Yahoo! Style Guide, along with our own editorial rules developed for victim education.
There is an irony in that. Modern AI systems were trained on large amounts of professional writing produced in many of these same styles. Clean grammar, orderly paragraph structure, consistent terminology, repeated explanation, clear sectioning, and formal editorial discipline can all resemble the patterns that AI detectors associate with machine-generated text.
That does not mean the text was written by AI.
AI writing detectors do not determine authorship. They estimate patterns. Those patterns can appear in AI-generated writing, human writing, professionally edited writing, academic writing, technical writing, legal writing, journalism, and highly structured educational material. A detector can flag human work because the prose is regular, grammatical, repetitive by design, or tightly organized. It can also fail to flag text that was produced with extensive AI assistance.
We do use AI in our editorial process.
Our team can use AI to help locate research, compare sources, identify missing questions, test possible ways of framing a subject, organize complex material, check structure, review grammar and spelling, identify unclear passages, and help us see where an explanation needs more work. AI can also help with proofreading and consistency across long educational materials.
Those functions are similar to using search tools, grammar checkers, reference software, editorial software, dictionaries, style guides, and research databases. The tool can assist the work. It does not carry responsibility for the finished publication.
Our human team does.
Our writers write every article or story. Every SCARS Institute publication goes through human review and editing. We decide what belongs in the material, what does not, what claims require support, what wording is appropriate for traumatized readers, what examples are responsible, and whether the final work reflects our standards. We reject suggestions that do not meet those standards. We rewrite material when it does not sound like us, does not fit the subject, or does not serve the people we are trying to help.
We also maintain a consistent page structure in each our websites, which can be different in each website. Headings, section order, terminology, metadata, internal links, explanatory blocks, and other page elements follow patterns that help readers find information and help search engines and AI systems understand what each page is about. That structure is deliberate. We want a scam victim searching for a specific problem to find the right material, and we want machines indexing our sites to understand the subject accurately enough to present it when someone asks for help.
This can make our pages look even more regular to automated detection systems.
We are not interested in disguising our use of AI, and we are not interested in pretending that modern publishing happens without digital tools. We are interested in producing accurate, readable, responsible material for people who need it.
AI assists parts of that work.
Humans remain responsible for the writing, the judgment, the editing, and the final publication.
SCARS Institute Team

is a publication of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. [registered dba SCARS]
To use this website, You Must Read and Agree to the SCARS Legal Policies and Terms and Conditions
LEGAL STATEMENT
The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to five years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.
Website and All Original Content, Concepts, and Intellectual Property Copyright © 1995 – 2026 | All Rights Reserved | Third-party Copyrights Acknowledged | Some Images Reproduced As Legal Record Of Criminal Use By Third-parties | Evidence Photos Used To Report Their Use In Criminal Fraud | In Some Cases The Persons Pictured In Photos Are Victims Of Identity Theft Unless Otherwise Indicated
Scam Victim’s Stories are presented with the permission of the author.
SCARS Institute™, Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams™, Society of Citizens Against Romance Scams™, SCARS|RSN™, Romance Scams Now™, SCARS|EDUCATION™, SCARS|SUPPORT™, SCARS|INTERNATIONAL™, SCARS|CHINA™, SCARS|UK™, SCARS|CANADA™, SCARS|LATINOAMERICA™, SCARS|MEMBERS™, SCARS|CDN™, Cybercrime Data Network™, AgainstScams™, Act AgainstScams™, Sludge Report™, Scam Victim Support Group™, RSN Steps™/SCARS Steps™, ScamCrime™, ScamsOnline™, Anyscam™, Cobalt Alert™, SCARS|GOFCH™, Global Online Fraud Clearinghouse™, SCARS|CERT™, RED BOOK™, BLUE BOOK™, GREEN BOOK™, Scam Organizer™ – in any form are trademarks of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated | Contact us at contact@AgainstScams.org for any issues about content displayed. visit To Learn More About SCARS Trademarks, Service Marks, and Indicia

SCARS Institute’s Encyclopedia of Scams™ Published Continuously for 25 Years
What Happens When the Scams Stop?
The Geopolitical Consequences of Ending an $8–10 Trillion Global Shadow Economy
The Politics of Scams & Fraud – A SCARS Institute Insight
Author:
• SCARS Institute Encyclopedia of Scams Editorial Team – Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
Article Abstract
x
What Happens When the Scams Stop?
The Geopolitical Consequences of Ending a USD $ 8–$10 Trillion Global Shadow Economy
Author’s Note
The global scam crisis is usually examined through the experiences of individual victims, criminal organizations, law enforcement, or cybersecurity. There is another dimension that deserves serious attention. Money stolen from victims does not disappear. It enters other economies, supports businesses, purchases property, finances corruption, strengthens criminal organizations, and in some cases supports armed groups and state activities.
If the scale of global fraud reaches $8–10 trillion annually, suppressing it would create consequences far beyond victim protection. Entire regions and political systems could discover that criminal money had quietly become part of their economic foundation. At the same time, victimized societies would retain enormous amounts of wealth that had previously been drained away.
Understanding that possibility changes the question from simply how the world can stop scams to what the world must prepare for when it finally succeeds.
An Analysis by Dr. Tim McGuinness
Assume that scams, fraud, cyber-enabled theft, deceptive investment schemes, impersonation crimes, relationship scams, business fraud, and their connected criminal economies are removing approximately $8–$10 trillion from legitimate economies every year – this is what is being reported by the leading independent cybersecurity organizations. At that scale, fraud is no longer adequately understood as a collection of crimes committed against individual victims. It becomes a global financial system operating alongside the legitimate one, continuously transferring wealth from households, businesses, pension accounts, governments, and financial institutions into criminal organizations, corrupt political structures, underground banking systems, laundering networks, armed groups and terrorists, and the economies that grow around them. That includes Southeast Asia, West Africa, and Latin America, though in reality it is everywhere.
If that flow stopped, the immediate result would unquestionably be good for victims. Trillions of dollars would remain with the people and institutions that earned or accumulated it. Yet the geopolitical consequences would be far more complicated. An illicit economy this large would already have become embedded within legitimate economies. Its disappearance would affect currencies, property markets, political patronage, organized crime, employment, international relations, and even political movements in the United States and Europe. The end of global scams would not simply remove criminals from the world economy. It would remove an enormous source of liquidity from places that have adapted to receiving it.
Current international law-enforcement evidence already shows the smaller-scale version of this structure. INTERPOL describes financial fraud as increasingly central to transnational organized crime, interconnected with human trafficking, cybercrime, specialized money laundering, and crime-as-a-service. Scam centers that began as a predominantly Southeast Asian phenomenon have expanded into Africa, the Middle East, Central America, and other regions. At an $8–10 trillion scale, those networks would represent one of the largest redistributive mechanisms in the global economy.
The Money Does Not Disappear When It Is Stolen
The central mistake in thinking about scams economically is imagining that stolen money somehow vanishes. It does not. Ownership changes.
A hundred thousand dollars removed from an American retirement account eventually pays somebody. It can become wages inside a scam operation, commissions for recruiters, payments to money mules, cryptocurrency purchases, bribes, rent, casino revenue, property purchases, luxury consumption, political contributions, protection payments, weapons, vehicles, telecommunications, or capital for another criminal enterprise.
Around every large illicit industry, legitimate economic activity begins to grow. Restaurants feed the people making money from it. Developers construct buildings for them. Automobile dealers sell to them. Banks receive deposits connected with them. Landlords collect rent. Local officials collect legal taxes and illegal payments. Families receive support from people employed by the industry. Eventually, thousands of people whose own activities are not necessarily criminal become economically dependent upon people whose income is.
At $8–10 trillion annually, that dependence would become systemic.
Stopping scams would consequently create two opposing economic events at the same time. Wealth would stop leaving victim economies, producing an enormous positive effect there. Recipient criminal economies would experience the equivalent of a sudden collapse in exports. This would benefit the middle class most, since they fuel the majority of large dollar amount scams.
China Would Lose Criminal Income, but China Itself Might Gain
China illustrates why the geopolitical consequences cannot be reduced to a simple transfer from the West to the developing world.
Chinese organized-crime networks have played major roles in the development of scam compounds across Southeast Asia. INTERPOL and the United Nations have documented the expansion of the model, while U.S. sanctions have targeted businesses and networks connected with Chinese organized crime and scam centers in Myanmar and Cambodia.
Yet China is also aggressively attacking these networks. Chinese authorities report dismantling more than 2,000 overseas fraud dens and arresting more than 80,000 suspects through international cooperation. Hundreds of thousands of Chinese nationals suspected of participating in overseas fraud operations have been returned from Myanmar, and Chinese citizens themselves are major victims of telecom and online fraud.
The disappearance of an $8–$10 trillion global scam economy would therefore damage Chinese criminal organizations, underground banking, illicit cryptocurrency channels, laundering operations, corrupt overseas business relationships, and sections of the property and gambling sectors that absorb criminal money. It would not necessarily reduce legitimate Chinese national income. China might actually gain economically from retaining money currently stolen from Chinese citizens while simultaneously eliminating capital flows into criminal organizations operating beyond Beijing’s control.
The political effect could also favor the Chinese state. A successful destruction of transnational scam networks would strengthen central control while weakening criminal organizations that move large quantities of money outside regulated financial channels.
India Would Face a Similar Division
India also demonstrates the danger of confusing the presence of scammers with national economic dependence upon scams. Fraudulent call centers and cybercrime networks operate from India, but India is simultaneously experiencing enormous domestic cyber-fraud losses. Official government figures recorded approximately 1.918 million cybercrime complaints and ₹22,811.95 crore in reported losses during 2024 alone. The Indian government has built national systems specifically intended to freeze fraudulent transfers and return money to victims.
If the $8–$10 trillion global scam economy disappeared, criminal call centers, money-mule networks, corrupt intermediaries, and businesses servicing them would lose income. Certain local areas would feel that loss.
India as a national economy, however, would probably benefit. Household wealth would remain with Indian families. Legitimate digital commerce would become safer. Trust in online banking and electronic payments would increase. The reputational damage created when legitimate Indian outsourcing and technology businesses are confused with fraudulent call centers would diminish.
The same distinction applies throughout much of the developing world. Ending crime removes illicit income, but it also removes victimization, corruption, reputational damage, financial exclusion, and the enormous cost of policing the crime.
North Korea Would Be Different
North Korea presents a much clearer case because cybercrime and deceptive employment schemes are directly connected to state revenue.
The U.S. Treasury states that North Korean IT-worker fraud generated nearly $800 million in 2024 and that the government uses these schemes to finance weapons programs. Treasury also reports that North Korean cybercriminals stole more than $3 billion in cryptocurrency over three years. In February 2025, the FBI attributed the approximately $1.5 billion Bybit cryptocurrency theft directly to North Korea.
For North Korea, eliminating fraud and cyber theft would not simply inconvenience criminals. It would remove hard currency from the state.
North Korea operates under extensive sanctions and has limited legitimate ways to obtain foreign currency. Even a comparatively small fraction of an $8–$10 trillion global criminal economy would therefore have disproportionate importance to Pyongyang. Successful suppression would reduce money available for weapons procurement, sanctions evasion, elite consumption, overseas intelligence activity, and technological development.
Among major geopolitical actors, North Korea would probably be one of the states most directly damaged by the disappearance of global cyber-enabled criminal revenue.
West Africa Would Experience a More Complicated Shock
West Africa would face a different transition. INTERPOL identifies West African organized-crime groups such as Black Axe as significant participants in romance scams, investment fraud, cryptocurrency fraud, business email compromise, money laundering, sextortion, and other crimes. Its 2026 African Cyberthreat Assessment describes romance scams and business email compromise as particularly prolific in West and Central Africa and reports scam-center activity across much of the continent.
At an $8–10 trillion global level, communities containing substantial concentrations of this activity would lose real purchasing power if scams stopped. Individuals earning money through fraud would stop buying houses, vehicles, clothing, electronics, entertainment, food, and services. Families supported by fraud proceeds would lose income. Money laundering businesses would contract. Corrupt officials would lose bribes.
Countries such as Nigeria and Ghana could therefore experience localized economic contractions, particularly in areas where cybercrime has become a meaningful informal occupation. Especially Nigeria.
The long-term effect, however, could be strongly positive. Criminal wealth distorts incentives. When a young person sees an educated professional earning modest wages while a successful fraudster buys houses and luxury vehicles, the illicit economy changes the perceived value of education, legitimate employment, and patience. Removing that alternative income forces labor and entrepreneurship back toward productive activity, although the transition would be painful without legitimate opportunities waiting to absorb them.
It would also improve the international reputation of West African economies, reduce banking restrictions, lower compliance risks for legitimate businesses, and make foreign investors less suspicious of transactions originating from the region.
Southeast Asia Would Face the Greatest Immediate Dislocation
Myanmar, Cambodia, and parts of Laos would probably experience some of the sharpest short-term consequences. Scam compounds there have become intertwined with casinos, property development, utilities, armed organizations, trafficking networks, and local political protection.
The U.S. Treasury has documented scam centers whose revenue supports armed groups in Myanmar. It has also sanctioned Cambodian networks involving large business organizations and properties associated with scam operations.
If the $8–$10 trillion global flow stopped abruptly, entire districts built around this economy could collapse. Property prices would fall. Casinos would lose customers. Compounds would empty. Security organizations would lose funding. Local officials would lose payments. Businesses servicing the compounds would close. Though, ironically, it might provide new housing for nearly all of Cambodia’s rural population.
Human trafficking for forced criminality would simultaneously become far less profitable. INTERPOL reports that victims from nearly 80 nationalities have been trafficked into scam operations. Eliminating the financial return could destroy one of the economic incentives supporting this modern form of slavery.
Yet armed groups and organized-crime organizations would not simply retire. They would search for substitute revenue through drugs, illegal mining, extortion, weapons, gambling, trafficking, kidnapping, ransomware, or natural-resource theft. The first several years after a successful global suppression of scams could consequently produce substantial criminal displacement.
Western Countries Would Experience an Enormous Wealth Retention Effect
The United States and Europe would experience almost the opposite economic event. The $8–10 trillion would not need to be recreated. It would simply never leave its lawful owners.
Retirement savings would remain invested; this would be a huge expansion of the stock markets. Home equity would remain with homeowners. Businesses would retain working capital. Families would preserve inheritances. Pensioners would retain assets that would otherwise disappear. Banks would absorb fewer fraud losses. Governments would face fewer bankruptcies, fewer impoverished elderly citizens, and fewer secondary social costs.
The FBI reported more than $20 billion in reported internet-crime losses in the United States during 2025 (but of course this is less than 5% of actual losses), with Americans over 60 accounting for approximately $7.7 billion of reported losses. Under the much larger $8–10 trillion premise, the unreported and indirect wealth effects would become politically transformative.
Economic security changes political behavior.
People who have lost retirement savings, accumulated debt, become dependent upon family, or lost confidence in institutions are not merely poorer. They become angrier, more fearful, and more receptive to explanations that identify governments, foreigners, corporations, technology companies, or elites as responsible for failing to protect them.
Stopping the drain would reduce one source of that insecurity.
The Political Impact in the United States
The movement most directly affected would probably be the American populist right, particularly the broader MAGA and nationalist law-and-order movement. Its political appeal includes themes of uncontrolled borders, foreign exploitation, weak institutions, national sovereignty, crime, and the belief that established elites have failed to protect ordinary citizens. A dramatic reduction in transnational fraud would remove one concrete manifestation of that perceived loss of control.
The effect would depend upon who received credit. If aggressive sanctions, financial restrictions, immigration controls, cryptocurrency enforcement, and unilateral U.S. pressure were seen as having ended the scam economy, nationalist movements could claim vindication. If multinational policing, banking regulation, platform accountability, and international cooperation produced the result, successful suppression could instead strengthen institutionalist and centrist politics.
Progressive and consumer-protection movements would also be affected. Their arguments for stronger bank accountability, technology-platform regulation, consumer protections, financial surveillance, and corporate responsibility would receive powerful validation if those mechanisms succeeded. At the same time, successful elimination of scams would eventually remove some of the conditions used to justify further regulation.
Libertarian and crypto-focused movements would face a different challenge. Ending an $8–10 trillion illicit economy would almost certainly require much stronger identity verification, transaction tracing, anti-money-laundering controls, international information sharing, and intervention in cryptocurrency networks. Those measures conflict directly with political movements emphasizing financial anonymity and minimal government oversight. If cleaner cryptocurrency markets emerged afterward, however, legitimate digital assets could gain credibility precisely because criminal usage had been reduced.
Perhaps the greatest political beneficiary would ultimately be institutional competence itself. Pew found that 73% of American adults had experienced at least one category of online scam or attack and that most financial victims never reported the event to law enforcement. Successfully ending a problem touching such a large portion of the population would provide unusually visible evidence that governments and institutions were capable of solving something.
The Political Impact in Europe
Europe would experience a similar realignment. Nationalist and right-populist movements have grown partly around perceptions of uncontrolled borders, transnational crime, migration, institutional weakness, and declining national sovereignty. Movements represented by parties such as Germany’s AfD, France’s National Rally, Reform UK, Spain’s Vox, and similar parties elsewhere would lose one category of evidence supporting the argument that established governments cannot control what crosses national borders.
Again, success could also strengthen them if voters believed their pressure forced governments to act.
The competing beneficiary would be European integration. European citizens already express substantial concern about cyberattacks, uncontrolled migration, terrorism, disinformation, and external security threats. In early 2026, 89% of respondents in a European Parliament survey said EU member states should act more closely together against global threats, while 66% wanted the EU to play a greater role in keeping them safe.
If coordinated European policing, financial intelligence, banking controls, sanctions, and cross-border prosecution helped eliminate the $8–10 trillion scam economy, the political argument for collective European action would become considerably stronger. It would demonstrate that a borderless criminal problem required institutions capable of operating across borders.
When the Drain Stops, Power Moves
The deepest consequence would not be economic growth or recession. It would be a redistribution of power.
Eight to ten trillion dollars buys more than consumer goods. It purchases political protection, weapons, technology, land, companies, loyalty, silence, influence, and legitimacy. It allows criminal organizations to become political organizations and corrupt businessmen to become respectable elites. It allows armed groups to survive and sanctioned states to acquire foreign currency.
If that flow stopped, the victims would not merely keep their money.
The organizations receiving it would lose the political power that the money purchased.
Some developing economies would suffer. Some regions would experience recessions. Criminal organizations would migrate into other forms of crime. Governments dependent upon illicit liquidity could become unstable. Western households and legitimate businesses would become considerably wealthier. Authoritarian and criminal systems that depend upon covert foreign income would weaken.
The world after scams would consequently not be the same world with fewer criminals.
It would be a world undergoing a massive financial rebalancing.
And if the annual transfer truly reaches $8–10 trillion, ending it would rank among the largest redistributions of economic and geopolitical power in modern history.
Conclusion
If the global scam economy is moving $8–10 trillion each year, stopping it would represent far more than a victory against crime. It would interrupt one of the largest transfers of wealth in the modern world and begin redistributing economic and political power back toward the people, businesses, pension systems, and legitimate institutions from which that wealth was taken.
The immediate benefits to victims and victimized economies would be substantial. Retirement savings would remain invested. Home equity would remain with families. Businesses would retain working capital. Governments would face fewer bankruptcies, impoverished retirees, financial emergencies, and secondary social costs. Trillions of dollars that currently move into criminal networks would instead continue circulating through legitimate economies.
The consequences elsewhere would be considerably more disruptive. Criminal organizations, corrupt officials, laundering networks, armed groups, scam compounds, underground financial systems, and businesses dependent upon criminal spending would lose enormous amounts of income. Regions that have allowed fraud proceeds to become embedded within property markets, casinos, construction, consumer spending, political patronage, and local employment could experience serious economic contractions. North Korea would lose an important source of foreign currency. Parts of West Africa and Southeast Asia could experience significant disruption. China and India would face losses within criminal sectors while potentially gaining from reduced domestic victimization and stronger legitimate financial systems.
Political consequences would follow the economic changes. Populist, nationalist, regulatory, institutionalist, libertarian, and European integration movements would all respond differently depending upon which policies were credited with suppressing fraud and which institutions gained greater authority in the process.
The end of scams would not simply leave the world with fewer criminals. It would expose how deeply criminal money had entered legitimate economies and political systems. The transition would be difficult, and organized crime would search for replacement sources of revenue. Yet the fundamental change would remain unmistakable.
When $8–10 trillion stops moving from victims into criminal economies, money does not disappear. Power changes hands.
Glossary
Author Biographies
About Prof. Tim McGuinness, Ph.D., DFin, MCPO, MAnth
Dr. Tim McGuinness is a co-founder, Managing Director, and Board Member of the SCARS Institute (Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.), where he serves as an unsalaried volunteer officer dedicated to supporting scam victims and survivors around the world. With over 34 years of experience in scam education and awareness, he is perhaps the longest-serving advocate in the field.
Dr. McGuinness has an extensive background as a business pioneer, having co-founded several technology-driven enterprises, including the former e-commerce giant TigerDirect.com. Beyond his corporate achievements, he is actively engaged with multiple global think tanks where he helps develop forward-looking policy strategies that address the intersection of technology, ethics, and societal well-being. He is also a computer industry pioneer (he was an Assistant Director of Corporate Research Engineering at Atari Inc. in the early 1980s) and invented core technologies still in use today.
His professional identity spans a wide range of disciplines. He is a scientist, strategic analyst, solution architect, advisor, public speaker, published author, roboticist, Navy veteran, and recognized polymath. He holds numerous certifications, including those in cybersecurity from the United States Department of Defense under DITSCAP & DIACAP, continuous process improvement and engineering and quality assurance, trauma-informed care, grief counseling, crisis intervention, and related disciplines that support his work with crime victims.
Dr. McGuinness was instrumental in developing U.S. regulatory standards for medical data privacy called HIPAA and financial industry cybersecurity called GLBA. His professional contributions include authoring more than 1,000 papers and publications in fields ranging from scam victim psychology and neuroscience to cybercrime prevention and behavioral science.
“I have dedicated my career to advancing and communicating the impact of emerging technologies, with a strong focus on both their transformative potential and the risks they create for individuals, businesses, and society. My background combines global experience in business process innovation, strategic technology development, and operational efficiency across diverse industries.”
“Throughout my work, I have engaged with enterprise leaders, governments, and think tanks to address the intersection of technology, business, and global risk. I have served as an advisor and board member for numerous organizations shaping strategy in digital transformation and responsible innovation at scale.”
“In addition to my corporate and advisory roles, I remain deeply committed to addressing the rising human cost of cybercrime. As a global advocate for victim support and scam awareness, I have helped educate millions of individuals, protect vulnerable populations, and guide international collaborations aimed at reducing online fraud and digital exploitation.”
“With a unique combination of technical insight, business acumen, and humanitarian drive, I continue to focus on solutions that not only fuel innovation but also safeguard the people and communities impacted by today’s evolving digital landscape.”
Dr. McGuinness brings a rare depth of knowledge, compassion, and leadership to scam victim advocacy. His ongoing mission is to help victims not only survive their experiences but transform through recovery, education, and empowerment.
To Understand All Scams, Read This:
The SCARS Institute Relationship Scams Formula Checklist
This is the Formula that all Relationship Scams Follow
-/ 30 /-
What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment below!
Table of Contents
ARTICLE CATEGORIES
Second-Party Fraud – Financial Fraud – Facilitated By Money Mules – What It Is – How It Works – 2026
Spotting AI Scams – Using AI to Catch Artificial Intelligence Scams – 2026
The SCARS Institute Relationship Scams Formula Checklist – 2026
The Psychology of Self-Justified Harm to Others – 2026
Scam Fraud and Related Terms Glossary – 2026
Updated Analysis of West African Scammers – 2026
Rapid Report Scammers
Visit SCARS www.Anyscam.com
Quick Reporting
Subscribe & New Item Updates
In the U.S. & Canada
U.S. & Canada Suicide Lifeline 988
Please Tell Us What You Took From This?
Please Leave A Comment!
Commenting Is An Essential Part Of Healing
Read • Think • Write
Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.
Recent Comments
On Other Articles
ARTICLE META
Important Information for New Scam Victims
If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org
If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines
A Note About Labeling!
We often use the term ‘scam victim’ in our articles, but this is a convenience to help those searching for information in search engines like Google. It is just a convenience and has no deeper meaning. If you have come through such an experience, YOU are a Survivor! It was not your fault. You are not alone! Axios!
A Question of Trust
At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.
Statement About Victim Blaming
SCARS Institute articles examine different aspects of the scam victim experience, as well as those who may have been secondary victims. This work focuses on understanding victimization through the science of victimology, including common psychological and behavioral responses. The purpose is to help victims and survivors understand why these crimes occurred, reduce shame and self-blame, strengthen recovery programs and victim opportunities, and lower the risk of future victimization.
At times, these discussions may sound uncomfortable, overwhelming, or may be mistaken for blame. They are not. Scam victims are never blamed. Our goal is to explain the mechanisms of deception and the human responses that scammers exploit, and the processes that occur after the scam ends, so victims can better understand what happened to them and why it felt convincing at the time, and what the path looks like going forward.
Articles that address the psychology, neurology, physiology, and other characteristics of scams and the victim experience recognize that all people share cognitive and emotional traits that can be manipulated under the right conditions. These characteristics are not flaws. They are normal human functions that criminals deliberately exploit. Victims typically have little awareness of these mechanisms while a scam is unfolding and a very limited ability to control them. Awareness often comes only after the harm has occurred.
By explaining these processes, these articles help victims make sense of their experiences, understand common post-scam reactions, and identify ways to protect themselves moving forward. This knowledge supports recovery by replacing confusion and self-blame with clarity, context, and self-compassion.
Additional educational material on these topics is available at ScamPsychology.org – ScamsNOW.com and other SCARS Institute websites.
Psychology Disclaimer:
All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only
The information provided in this article is intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.
While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.
Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.
If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.
Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here to go to our ScamsNOW.com website.
If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.