
SCARS Institute’s Encyclopedia of Scams™ Published Continuously for 25 Years

FTC Issues Orders to Social Media and Video Streaming Platforms Regarding Efforts to Address Surge in Scam Advertising for Fraudulent Products and Scams
FTC issues 6(b) orders to Meta, TikTok, YouTube, Twitter, and others seeking information on how the platforms screen for misleading ads for scam advertising and fraudulent or counterfeit products
SCARS NOTE: This is a major step for public safety since it is the first crack in the Communications Decency Act section 230 stranglehold on social media platform immunity!
With fraud on social media surging, the Federal Trade Commission has issued orders to eight social media and video streaming platforms seeking information on how these companies scrutinize and restrict paid commercial advertising that is deceptive or exposes consumers to fraudulent healthcare products, financial scams, counterfeit and fake goods, or other fraud.
The amount of money consumers have reported losing to fraud and scam advertising that originated on social media platforms in scam advertising has skyrocketed since 2017. In 2022 alone, consumers reported losing more than $1.2 billion to fraud that started on social media, more than any other contact method, according to FTC data.
The Commission also is seeking information about how the social media and video streaming companies ensure that consumers are able to identify commercial advertising on their platforms as advertising.
The orders, which the companies are required to comply with by law, were sent to: Meta Platforms, Inc.; Instagram, LLC; YouTube, LLC; TikTok, Inc.; Snap, Inc.; Twitter, Inc.; Pinterest, Inc.; and Twitch Interactive, Inc. More may be send in the near future.
“Social media has been a gold mine for scammers who tout sham products and other scams that have cost consumers enormously in recent years,” said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “This study will help the FTC ensure that social media and video streaming companies are doing everything they can to keep scammers and deceptive ads off their platforms.”
The orders will collect information about the companies’ standards and policies related to paid commercial ads and their processes for screening and monitoring for compliance with those standards and policies, including through human review and the use of automated systems. The orders also require the companies to report their ad revenue, the number of ad views, and other performance metrics, including for ads involving categories of products and services more prone to deception such as those intended to treat, prevent, or cure substance use disorders and tout income opportunities. At the heart of this though is to see if the platforms are fulfilling their responsibilities on scam advertising
These orders will help the Commission better understand how prevalent deceptive advertising is on social media and video streaming platforms, the consumers who may be harmed by that advertising, and the effectiveness of the platforms’ oversight of advertisers, including whether the companies treat English-language and Spanish-language ads differently. The study also should shed light on how the platforms create ads, including any use of generative artificial intelligence, and track, and classify ads, as well as the ad formats offered to advertisers, including shoppable ads, which allow consumers to purchase products or services directly through the ad, and virtual reality and other extended reality ads.
In addition, the Commission seeks information on how these platforms help consumers distinguish scam advertising and other commercial messages from other types of content, including disclosure tools for endorsers and influencers.
The orders seek information for the calendar years 2019 through 2023, which allows for the Commission to study relevant business conduct since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The orders were sent using the FTC’s 6(b) authority, which authorizes the Commission to conduct wide-ranging studies that do not have a specific law enforcement purpose.
The Commission voted 4-0 during an open meeting to issue the 6(b) orders to the eight social media and video service services to explore scam advertising.
This will be a very important step in controlling fake, fraudulent, and scam advertising, and by extension, business accounts on these platforms.
-/ 30 /-
What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment below!
Table of Contents
To Understand All Scams
Read This
The SCARS Institute Relationship Scams Formula Checklist
This is the Formula that all Relationship Scams Follow
Recent Comments
On Other Articles
- Barbara on SCARS Institute – Romance Scam Simulator: “Fantastic! I have to go to bed, but I’ll do some more tomorrow. I picked an easy scenario tonight, but…” Oct 9, 18:01
- on United States – Federal Bureau of Investigations [FBI]: “It is only that way because of the shame you feel. The reality is that it was not your fault.…” Sep 30, 15:36
- on United States – Federal Bureau of Investigations [FBI]: “yhisis humiliating experience e and isembarassassing to to own up to peolealreadyassume u are not to bright because Arnold and…” Sep 30, 12:28
- on United States – Federal Bureau of Investigations [FBI]: “should be better known by public live in assisiwdlivi g apartment many manyinstancresof Romance scams here ano.us ederly l” Sep 30, 12:24
- on Is It A Scam? Phone Scam Diagnostic – v1: “I tried the this test Is it a phone scam? Mine was. I think this is a helpful tool to…” Sep 30, 10:34
- on Is It A Scam? Romance Scam Diagnostic – v2: “Carole, as you move forward with your recovery, you will learn how this all works. It was not your fault.…” Sep 29, 17:37
- on Is It A Scam? Romance Scam Diagnostic – v2: “I was blinded by such clever manipulation” Sep 29, 15:15
- on The SCARS Institute Relationship Scams Formula Checklist – 2026: “As I read this I could see myself in every step with my scam. I gained a lot more knowledge…” Aug 28, 19:51
- on The Persistence of Danielle Delaunay as a Fake Identity – 2026: “Unfortunately, you are being scammed. She is using a fake name regardless. At this point, your best option is to…” Aug 26, 20:16
- on The Persistence of Danielle Delaunay as a Fake Identity – 2026: “Dear Sirs, I have met this woman with the name Abigail Boateng in Ghana. I have an intensive mail contact…” Aug 26, 12:28





Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.