--- title: "Relative Deprivation – A Cognitive Bias That Makes Scam Victims Believe They Are Unfairly Disadvantaged – 2024" canonical: https://romancescamsnow.com/relative-deprivation-a-cognitive-bias-that-makes-scam-victims-believe-they-are-unfairly-disadvantaged-2024/ type: post author: "SCARS Institute Editorial Team" published: 2024-03-31 modified: 2024-03-31 categories: ["♦ PSYCHOLOGY OF SCAMS", "2024", "Cognitive Biases & Vulnerabilities", "Insights", "Psychology of Scams", "Victim Vulnerability", "♦ SCAM VICTIM RECOVERY"] summary: "" organization: "SCARS Institute - Encyclopedia of Scans - World's #1 Anti-Scam Website - Romance Scams NOW" organization_url: https://romancescamsnow.com/ llms: https://romancescamsnow.com/llms.txt --- # Relative Deprivation – A Cognitive Bias That Makes Scam Victims Believe They Are Unfairly Disadvantaged – 2024 # Relative Deprivation - A Cognitive Bias That Makes Scam Victims Believe They Are Unfairly Disadvantaged ## Cognitive Biases Play a Role in Your Vulnerability & Susceptibility to Scams and Create Difficulty Recovering from Them! ### The Psychology of Scams - A SCARS Insight ##### Author: • Tim McGuinness, Ph.D., DFin, MCPO, MAnth - Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. ## Article Abstract Relative Deprivation is a psychological concept and cognitive bias that arises when individuals perceive themselves as unfairly disadvantaged compared to others. Relative Deprivation occurs when people feel they lack resources, opportunities, or status relative to those around them, leading to resentment and discontentment. Scam victims often experience this when comparing their suffering or recovery progress to that of others. This can exacerbate feelings of inadequacy and frustration, hindering their healing process. Overcoming relative deprivation involves acknowledging emotions, seeking support, and reframing perspectives. By celebrating progress and focusing on gratitude, victims can reclaim control over their narrative and pave the way for a brighter future amidst adversity. ## Relative Deprivation is a Psychological Concept that arises when Individuals Perceive themselves as Unfairly Disadvantaged compared to others It occurs when people feel that they lack resources, opportunities, or status relative to those around them, leading to feelings of resentment, frustration, and discontentment. In the context of scam victims, relative deprivation can manifest when they compare their own suffering or victimization to that of others. ## Introduction to Relative Deprivation After a scam, individuals often face a tumultuous journey towards emotional recovery. While the immediate financial repercussions are evident, the psychological aftermath can be equally, if not more, debilitating. Among the multiple of challenges that scam victims encounter during their recovery journey, one often overlooked yet profoundly impactful factor is relative deprivation. This psychological phenomenon, a cognitive bias, rooted in social comparison, can cast a long shadow over victims' attempts to heal and rebuild their lives. Scam victims experience relative deprivation in various ways. Firstly, they might compare their financial losses or emotional trauma to those of other victims or non-victims, feeling that their own experience is more severe or unjust. This can exacerbate feelings of anger, bitterness, and a sense of being unfairly treated by fate or circumstance. This is somewhat natural but must be controlled or it can easily get out of control. Moreover, in the aftermath of a scam, victims may also compare their recovery progress to that of others. Seeing fellow victims seemingly moving on with their lives more quickly or coping better can intensify feelings of inadequacy, self-blame, and frustration. This comparison may lead to a distorted perception of their own recovery journey, hindering progress and exacerbating psychological distress. It can be useful to compare one’s own progress against an ideal model, but never against other victims specifically. This is particularly important in cases where scam victims drifted away from recovery or stalled their progress through resistance and avoidance mechanisms. Sadly, in the age of social media, where individuals often create idealized (fake) versions of their lives, scam victims may be exposed to unrealistic portrayals of resilience and success. Seeing others seemingly unaffected by similar experiences can fuel feelings of isolation and alienation, amplifying the sense of relative deprivation. In essence, relative deprivation among scam victims underscores the complexity of their psychological experience. By comparing their suffering or victimization to that of others, they can inadvertently magnify their own sense of injustice and hardship, hindering their ability to heal and move forward. Recognizing and addressing these feelings within an honest, supportive, and understanding environment is mandatory in facilitating the recovery process and fostering resilience among scam victims. ## Understanding Relative Deprivation Relative deprivation is a cognitive bias where individuals perceive themselves as disadvantaged compared to others in similar circumstances. It stems from the innate human tendency to assess one's well-being and success in relation to others, rather than in absolute terms. In the context of scam victims, relative deprivation can manifest in various ways, exacerbating the already complex emotional landscape post-scam. ## The Impact on Scam Victims After the scam ends, victims may find themselves grappling with feelings of inadequacy, resentment, and bitterness as they compare their circumstances to those of others. They might perceive others as having recovered more swiftly or suffered less severe consequences, leading to a sense of injustice and unfairness. This comparison can intensify the victim's emotional distress and impede their progress towards recovery. ## During Emotional Recovery Relative deprivation continues to haunt scam victims during their emotional recovery journey. As they navigate the process of healing and rebuilding their lives, victims may encounter triggers that reignite feelings of deprivation and resentment. Milestones such as financial stability, career advancement, or personal achievements achieved by others can serve as painful reminders of their own setbacks and losses. Moreover, the pervasive nature of social media exacerbates the impact of relative deprivation on scam victims. Constant exposure to curated depictions of others' successes and happiness can fuel feelings of inadequacy and amplify the sense of being left behind. Scam victims may internalize these comparisons, further eroding their self-esteem and hindering their ability to move forward. ## Challenges in Recovery Relative deprivation poses significant challenges to scam victims' recovery efforts. It can fuel a cycle of negative emotions, including envy, self-doubt, and resentment, which undermine their psychological well-being. Moreover, the persistent sense of being disadvantaged can lead to a distorted perception of reality, where victims struggle to recognize their progress and accomplishments. ## Overcoming Relative Deprivation Addressing relative deprivation requires a multifaceted approach that combines self-awareness, cognitive reframing, and social support. Scam victims must first acknowledge and validate their emotions without succumbing to self-blame or despair. By recognizing that recovery is a unique and nonlinear process, victims can cultivate self-compassion and resilience in the face of adversity. Practical strategies, such as limiting exposure to triggering stimuli on social media, seeking professional counseling, and participating in support groups, can provide invaluable support to scam victims. Engaging in activities that foster personal growth and self-care can also help individuals regain a sense of agency and purpose in their lives. Plus, reframing the narrative of relative deprivation can empower victims to shift their focus from comparison to gratitude and appreciation for their own journey. By celebrating their progress, however small, and reframing setbacks as opportunities for growth, victims can reclaim control over their narrative and pave the way for a brighter future. ## Summary Relative deprivation casts a long shadow over the emotional recovery journey of scam victims, complicating their efforts to heal and rebuild their lives. However, by recognizing the impact of social comparison bias and implementing strategies to mitigate its effects, victims can navigate the challenges of recovery with resilience and determination. Ultimately, by embracing self-compassion, seeking support, and reframing their perspective, scam victims can emerge from adversity stronger and more resilient than before. ## About Cognitive Biases This article is part of SCARS continuing commitment to helping the victims of scams (financial fraud) to better understand the psychology of scams. In other words, why are victims vulnerable and how do Cognitive Biases relate to that? ## How Do Cognitive Biases Make People Vulnerable To Scams, Fraud, and Deception How do cognitive biases play a role in making people vulnerable and susceptible to scams, fraud, and deception? Cognitive biases are mental shortcuts that allow people to make quick decisions and judgments based on their past experiences and memories. These biases can be helpful in many situations, as they allow people to process large amounts of information quickly and efficiently. However, they can also make people vulnerable to scams, fraud, and deception. One reason why cognitive biases make people vulnerable to scams is that they can lead people to make judgments that are not based on evidence or logical reasoning. For example, [Confirmation Bias](https://romancescamsnow.com/dating-scams/scars-psychology-of-scams-confirmation-bias-letting-your-desires-control-what-you-see/) (a major bias that makes people vulnerable) is the tendency to seek out and interpret information that supports one's preexisting beliefs, while ignoring or dismissing information that contradicts them. This can make people more susceptible to scams that appeal to their beliefs or biases, as they are more likely to believe the scammer's claims without critically evaluating the evidence. There are several ways that people can protect themselves from scams, fraud, and deception. One way is to be aware of common cognitive biases and how they can affect decision-making. This can help people to be more mindful of their thought processes and to question their own judgments. Another way to protect oneself is to be skeptical of claims and offers that seem too good to be true. It is important to carefully evaluate the evidence and to ask questions before making a decision. This can help people to avoid falling for scams that rely on emotional appeals or incomplete information. It can also be helpful to seek out additional sources of information and to consult with trusted friends, family members, or professionals before making a decision. This can provide a more balanced perspective and help to identify any potential red flags. But if you do not understand your Cognitive Biases then you will not even see the red flags! Overall, cognitive biases can make people vulnerable to scams, fraud, and deception by leading them to make judgments that are not based on evidence or logical reasoning, and by causing them to make irrational or risky decisions. However, by being aware of these biases and taking steps to protect oneself, people can reduce their risk of falling victim to these types of scams. ## Summary Cognitive biases do make people more vulnerable to scams, fraud, and deception by causing them to ignore warning signs, pay more attention to information that supports their preexisting beliefs, rely on incomplete information, and anchor their decisions to easy and often incorrect information. By being aware of these biases and making an effort to overcome them, people can be better equipped to avoid falling victim to scams and other forms of deception.